A year or so ago, I was in the library and by random chance (yeah, like there is such a thing) happened across Tony Buzan's book on mind mapping. I knew what it was, but had never actually used it.
I checked the book out and started experimenting with it. I was pleasantly surprised at how it enabled me to flesh out ideas I thought were already well explored.
If you're a visual thinker, mindmapping will score double bonus points with you.
Here are a couple links to get you started:
I always come to your blog and go, ahh. There's hope in the world.
Posted by: Jo | December 02, 2003 at 11:00 AM
Can you comment on the differences you see between mindmapping and using a good outliner?
Posted by: steven | December 02, 2003 at 02:10 PM
Mind Mapping Software and More!:
Axon Idea Processor
Posted by: Avi Solomon | December 03, 2003 at 05:15 AM
See also:
Robert Horn on Visual Language
and
Logo Visual Technology
Posted by: Avi Solomon | December 03, 2003 at 05:39 AM
Steven-
Outlines are linear and hierarchical. It's difficult to represent lateral connections.
Say I were doing the building blocks "I am passionate about ____ because ___, ___, ___..." exercise. I notice that "challenging" and "visible progress" show up under both programming and karate. In a mind map I can make that theme more explicit, by circling all the instances of a theme in a particular color, or connecting them with lines. I could label that connection "CHALLENGING" and start a whole new branch about what that means to me. And then I can embellish that with drawings or comments ("BOOyeah!") or other things that aren't data points but further capture the idea.
All that could be converted to an outline, but it would lose something.
Posted by: Janet | December 03, 2003 at 06:45 AM
Janet, thanks. I've always thought "what's the big deal, it's just a spread-out outline," but your description helps me understand. I've put a 'hold' on Buzan's book at the local library and will give it an honest trial.
Are any of the mindmapping software packages better/worse in your (the collective "your" here, Curt and other readers) experience?
Posted by: Steven | December 03, 2003 at 05:44 PM
Thanks for answering Steven's question, Janet! And a much more eloquent and informed answer than I could have given, at that. (mmmmmmm...pretty circles...oooooooohhh).
I love it when community starts to happen. :)
And for the record, Mr. Analog Boy here uses his handy dandy whiteboard for his mind-mapping endeavors, so I can offer zippo, zilch, zero insights on that one.
your faithful luddite host,
curt
Posted by: Curt Rosengren | December 03, 2003 at 10:58 PM
Hi Steven-
A friend speaks highly of MindMapper, which she uses on her PDA.
I tried a shareware package a couple years ago and quickly stopped using it. It took a lot of fussing to make it look the way I wanted, which stole my focus, and it wasn't very expressive.
Oh, another strength of mind mapping is it encourages brainstorming. I use outlines to organize ideas once they're generated, but they're so structured that they dampen the brainstorming fire. I, II, A, B, i, ii... it's like having to raise your hand in class.
Posted by: Janet | December 04, 2003 at 08:56 AM