10 reasons to eat less meat
For a good primer of some of the reasons to downshift your meat consumption, here's an overview of 10 reasons to eat less meat.
--
--
--
I've been feeling like the topsy turvy economy might be just what's needed to shake things up so the pieces come down in a more sustainable way. Here's an interesting article outlining 7 fixes from the Green Economy.
The 7 ideas are:
[Hat tip to Sara Moore at Woolley Farms for the article link]
--
You wouldn't think a Microsoft VP would find himself running to catch the bus to work on a regular basis, but at least one of them does. And he would like to see others do the same. Dan Treadwell is a fan of creative commuting.
David Treadwell runs to catch the bus — and with purpose. It's part of his "exercise commute."
A resident of Queen Anne and a vice president at Microsoft in Redmond, Treadwell faces a long daily commute over the car-choked and pedestrian-unfriendly Evergreen Floating Bridge. That makes him seem like the unlikeliest of candidates to choose running as his favored mode of getting to and from work.
Yet, he does it. The bus gets him across the span — but running several miles to and from the bus makes up the exercise portions of his commute.
He started doing this two years ago and has since persuaded a few other commuters to incorporate exercise into their commute at least once or twice a week.
--
When it comes to buying carbon offsets to neutralize the amount of CO2 our energy consumption creates, all options are not created equal. Here's an article in The Seattle Times with some tips on making an informed, effective choice about your carbon offsets purchase.
The tips include...
Peek behind the curtain. Don't accept claims of carbon-offset providers at face value. Ask questions: Who are their partners and endorsers? Do they undergo independent audits to confirm that the money helps the right projects? How do their prices compare with other providers? Which industry standards do they use?
No double-dipping. Make sure a carbon-offset provider's projects offer what is known in the industry as "additionality." In other words, they should not be projects that would have happened anyway without the funding from carbon offsets (such as projects mandated by a government).
Think twice about trees. While they may help the environment in other ways, tree-planting or reforestation projects are the most controversial types of carbon-offset projects. Trees absorb CO2, but scientists disagree on the effectiveness of tree-planting to reduce global warming.
Look in your own backyard. When carbon-offset providers or projects have Northwest roots, you may have more of a connection and greater accountability.
Power up. You can also "think globally and act locally" by joining the green power programs offered by local utilities.
First things first. Before you invest in carbon offsets or green power, make sure you've done all you can to reduce your environmental impact: Drive less, insulate your home, install energy-efficient appliances and buy less stuff. Carbon offsets will never replace good old-fashioned conservation.
--
If you're from the US and the environment is a major factor in your voting decisions, you may just want to stay away from John McCain, at least according to the League of Conservation Voters' environmental scorecard:
The scorecards, which rank individual U.S. legislators based on their votes on environmental issues, focused on 15 votes this year--all of which senator McCain missed, resulting in a 0% score.
Presidential candidates historically suffer from absenteeism, due to busy campaign schedules that keep them away from Washington. However, Obama and Clinton both missed only 4 environmental votes, and received scores of 67% and 73% respectively.
McCain's lifetime average, as scored by LCV, is 24%, far below Obama's 86% lifetime average and Clinton's 87% lifetime average.
--
Besides the feelgood factor, is there a compelling reason for companies to go green? According to a new study, the answer to that is a resounding yes.
U.S. workers favor green companies, and green companies have higher performance, according to two new studies.
A new report reviewing buyer preferences and the performance of green brands found that top performing companies with strong green practices have three times more customer satisfaction than poor performers, as well as 4.7 times more employee satisfaction and 1.7 times more revenue per employee.
"Business people have worried about the cost of being green," said Peter Brockmann, President of Brockmann & Company, the consulting firm that released the report. "We provide evidence that companies that focus on recycling in the office, reducing energy consumption in the office and use video conferencing or telepresence technologies intensively, also have higher customer satisfaction, higher employee satisfaction and higher revenues per employee."
Not only do companies with a green approach yield more satisfaction and higher performance, they're also in line with what employees say they want, according to another recent study.
In a separate survey, commissioned by National Geographic magazine, more than 80% of U.S. workers polled said they believe it is important to work for a company or organization that makes the environment a top priority. Yet, only 53% currently work for a company or organization that implements environmental or sustainable programs in the workplace, the poll revealed.
[hat tip to Sara Moore for the link]
--
I've never been a big fan of the idea of GMO's (genetically modified organisms), but if I'm honest, I have to say that has been more of a knee-jerk opinion than a well-informed view.
I'm reading Stolen Harvest: The Hijacking of the Global Food Supply right now, which is offering up a generous helping of the cons of GMO's. I wanted to start getting a better picture of what both sides of the argument are saying so I can develop a better-informed opinion, so I started doing some research.
Here are some of the articles I ran across with outlining the pros and cons of genetically modified food.
Genetically modified food: Pros and cons
GM Crops: The arguments pro and con
The Risks and Benefits of Genetically Modified Crops: A Multidisciplinary Perspective
Genetic engineering: The controversy
BBC: Food under the microscope
Genetically modified food: Pros and cons
Pros and cons of genetic engineering
GM Products: Benefits and Controversies
Weighing Pros and Cons of Genetically Modified Crops in Africa
Pro-GM
Study finds benefits in GM crops
A report on genetically engineered crops
Anti-GM
Genetically engineered (GE) food - safety problems
Statements on the dangers of GM by scientists
Debunking the myths of genetic engineering in food crops
The risks of genetic engineering
Myths spread by the pro-GM, anti-organic movement
--
Seattle, where I live, has one of the highest per capita boat ownership rates in the world. Spending time out on the water can be a wonderful way to connect with nature, but from nasty paints to spilled fuel, it can also wreak havoc on the environment. If you love your boat, but want to make the experience as low-impact as possible, here's a great page chock full of eco-friendly boating tips.
--
If you're in the US and you want to try your hand at both eating local and eating food that's in season, here's a great seasonal eating guide on The Sustainable Table that maps out in-season produce by state.
Why eat local and in-season? As the site puts it...
By purchasing local foods in-season, you eliminate the environmental damage caused by shipping foods thousands of miles, your food dollar goes directly to the farmer, and your family will be able to enjoy the health benefits of eating fresh, unprocessed fruits and vegetables. Buying seasonal produce also provides an exciting opportunity to try new foods and to experiment with seasonal recipes. And it simply tastes better!
What's not to love about that?
--
Recent Comments